Menu

EKINOPS en français

WELCOME TO

EKINOPS BLOG

It’s all in the Bin: The bright future of Operator SLAs

pexels-photo-669615

A growing number of Service Level Agreements (SLA) between customers and Communication Service Providers (CSPs) are being expressed in terms of percentiles. This practice gives CSPs the opportunity to both refine the SLA collaboratively with their customer and also to monetize performance information obtained from their network. It also enables customer to choose from a wider pool of SLAs and adapt them to their specific needs. Some operators even pay penalties if they fail to meet the conditions of the SLA.

What are SLA percentiles and how are they used?

 In the network environment, a percentile is a measurable percentage of performance either above or below an agreed level.   Percentile measurements are commonly performed over an agreed interval, to ensure they adequately represent the performance of all the packets delivered over that network. A good example is packet delay. Here a SLA might specify that 95% of the packets need to be delivered within 10ms, providing crystal clarity over when a SLA breach occurs. 

Calculating percentiles over a measurement interval, however, is resource intensive and, as a result, can prove cost prohibitive. One elegant way to bring the cost down is to obtain percentile measurements using Measurement Bins. A Bin is a kind of counter that increases every time a measured value falls within pre-determined boundaries. In their simplest form, two kinds of Bins can be defined: one for the measurement interval from zero to a threshold value, and a second from this threshold value upwards, infinitely. By just counting the number of values that fall within the first interval or Bin and dividing this value by the total number of values in the measurement interval, one can directly obtain the percentile of measurements that fall within the SLA. Performing this task is, comparably, very efficient, making it easy to verify whether or not the contractual SLA has been honoured.

Bin-novation

See full post

Unpacking the technologies behind the Zero-Touch Provisioning of a universal CPE

uCPE

Explore the combination of technologies that enable remote provisioning and management of the uCPE and the VNFs this powerful new device supports.

A Universal Customer Premises Equipment (uCPE) consists of both software and hardware components to create a small virtualization platform at the customer premises and which is capable of running multiple Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) in a local service chain. This is similar to running Virtualized Network Functions in the datacentre but at a smaller scale. This enables Communication Service Providers (CSPs) to disaggregate software and hardware at the CPE level and provides them with unprecedented flexibility to run any type of service on the same commoditized hardware platform.

The services delivered by this programmable end-user device are in general controlled by Next Generation Service Orchestrators, who take care of the service configuration aspects of the delivered services. Another level of Orchestration concerns the deployment of the uCPE in the field. One of the challenges is to minimize its deployment cost using zero-touch provisioning. Pushing a new configuration to a uCPE is more complicated than to legacy CPEs because not only the configuration of the uCPE needs to be pushed to the device, but also the service chaining topology and the VNF images with their initial configurations. Using the NETCONF/YANG protocol however it is possible to push the complete initial configuration to the uCPE including the service chaining configuration and the VNF images with their initial start-up configuration. The initial communication with the provisioning server can be achieved using the NETCONF Call Home functionality, which allows the CPE to identify itself to the provisioning server and receive the correct configuration associated with the customer where the device is installed.

With zero-touch provisioning it is possible to install a uCPE and its configuration in an automated way. In many cases, however, end-to-end orchestration systems don’t support zero-touch provisioning yet or provisioning systems are not in place or sufficiently mature to support this level of automation.

In addition to the OneAccess-branded uCPE hardware (OVP or Open Virtualized Platform) and software (LIM or Local Infrastructure Manager), EKINOPS also offers OneManage to provide a solution for zero-touch provisioning of uCPEs based on a service catalog. OneManage supports a northbound interface to interface with OSS/BSS systems to receive customer-related data associated with a new uCPE deployment. In this way OneManage is an infrastructure orchestrator or sub-orchestrator, taking care of the provisioning of the uCPEs and the management of the installed uCPE base.

See full post

Keeping Satellite in the 5G Game

Keeping_Satellite_5G_Game

EKINOPS explores the intersection between virtualization, 5G and satellite communications, highlighting how a recent technology breakthrough will deliver additional value for satcom providers, CSPs and end-users alike.

5GPP, the EU body charged with establishing global consensus on the use of 5G, has been making strong progress in defining how the new connectivity standard can support a rapidly growing range of future use cases. Telecom operators, who will be required to make huge investments in replacing masts, antennas, base stations and other equipment to support 5G, are happy to wait for the body to publish its specifications. Satcom providers, however, are not. As things currently stand, satcom is not part of the 5G game and, as a result, its equipment and service providers risk being elbowed out of use-cases for which satellite is today’s de-facto choice.

From a commercial perspective, communication service providers (CSPs) know that their ability to support all types of network links gives them the flexibility to deliver bespoke solutions that maximise value for their customers. To this end, harmonising satellite with 5G makes a lot of sense, particularly where the technology can augment 5G services.

The range of situations that favour a satcom/5G solution is bigger than one might think, and extends beyond the infrequent, high bandwidth requirements of native satcom broadcasting, live sports stadium feeds and news broadcasting. Satellite also has a valuable role to play in areas where 5G networks have limited coverage, allowing 5G traffic backhauling to remote areas, for example, and complementing ‘slow’ terrestrial links thanks to multi-link technology and connections to mobile vehicles and planes.

Fortunately, this argument has already been recognised within 5GPP, and has given rise to SaT5G, an H2020 European Research project with the objective of designing next generation standards that make satcom 5G-friendly. The group is developing a cost-effective ‘plug and play’ satcom solution for 5G to enable operators and network vendors to accelerate 5G deployment in all geographies and, at the same time, create new and growing market opportunities for satcom industry stakeholders.

See full post

Hello from the Other Side: The Customer Benefits of NFV

hello_from_other_side

Operators should start their NFV charm offensive now says Pravin Mirchandani, CMO, EKINOPS.

Surprisingly few of today’s conversations about NFV address how a virtualized infrastructure will benefit end-user businesses. If operators and CSPs want to bring their customers across without resistance, however, they must also consider how to position the benefits of NFV, particularly since some may view its new technologies as an unsolicited risk.

Flexible provisioning is the big persuader. Most businesses experience peak traffic at infrequent and predictable times. Despite only needing this level of service occasionally, however, they have had no option but to sign contracts that deliver this maximum capacity all the time. Operators haven’t had the flexibility to deliver anything else. Virtualization can change all of this.

This is big news because firms of all shapes and sizes are caught in this trap. Pizza companies do 90% of their business on Friday and Saturday nights, yet provision for these peaks seven days a week. This is a huge overhead, particularly for a national networked outfit like Domino’s. Other businesses, particularly retail e-commerce sites, are governed by seasonality. The spikes in online sales triggered by Black Friday and the January sales are well documented. Hotels beef up their network capacity for four intensive months of high occupancy but, under today’s model, must provision equally for the quieter eight.

Virtualization can address this need. A software-defined infrastructure will give customers access to a portal through which they can self-select the services they need and specify when they need them. The programmatic benefits of virtualization enable operators to spin them up automatically. Compare that to the weeks of notice that an operator currently needs to install a new line and the end-user benefits come into stark focus.

See full post

A Gig Ticket: A Chance for Operators to Grow the Market for 1Gbps L3 Services

a-gig-ticket-a-chance-for-operators-to-grow-the-market-for-1gbps-l3-services

Recent innovations in customer premises equipment (CPE) mean that operators can now bring 1Gbps Layer 3 connectivity to a much bigger market. Just in time, too, explains Pravin Mirchandani, CMO, OneAccess Networks.

Industry dialogue about ‘the race to 1Gbps’ has, until now, largely focused on the challenge of laying fiber and how operators might backhaul via ‘dark fiber’ laid in the dotcom boom.

Huge strides have been made. In the US, ultra-fast networking university collective, Gig.U., revealed last year that ‘scores of American communities are now deeply engaged in deploying ultra-fast networks’. And it’s no secret that forward thinking players like Google and AT&T are intent on hooking up America’s major cities to fiber networks. Across Europe, challenged by terrain, borders and a fragmented marketplace, all-fiber connectivity has been harder to achieve but, like the US, fiber to the premises rollouts are well underway in most major cities.

It’s a good job, too. As the world’s businesses continue to migrate into the Cloud, the global market’s appetite for 1Gbps Layer 3 connectivity is growing, fast. Business adoption of increasingly bandwidth-hungry cloud apps and services is driving up speed requirements and putting pressure on operators to democratize 1Gbps connectivity by offering service contracts to the masses of distributed enterprises and SMBs at price points they can afford.

In this effort, operators have faced an equipment challenge. Cost effective 1Gbps in Carrier Ethernet has been around for some time but, until now, application-oriented ‘Layer 3’ 1Gbps connectivity has remained exclusive to the enterprise HQ. This is largely because the customer premises equipment (CPE) capable of delivering 1Gbps Layer 3 services has been ill-suited to mass deployment by operators. Having been designed for the Enterprise HQ, it is disproportionately expensive, big, cumbersome to deploy and laden with ports and features that operators simply don’t need. As a result, ultra-fast connectivity ‘for the masses’ has been neither economically nor operationally viable.

See full post

Managing the machines: How operators can get ahead in M2M

managing-the-machines-how-operators-can-get-ahead-in-m2

The deployment of Machine to Machine (M2M) initiatives is generating new revenue opportunities for operators and communication service providers (CSPs). Pravin Mirchandani, CMO, OneAccess Networks, explains how innovative traffic management services, delivered via customer premises-based equipment, or CPE, can help them capitalize on these opportunities.

Vodafone’s third annual M2M Barometer survey has confirmed that businesses are embracing M2M technologies faster than ever before. Over a quarter (27 per cent) of all companies worldwide are now using connected technology to develop and grow their businesses. In particular, the retail sector, together with the healthcare, utilities and automotive industries are all moving to maximize M2M’s potential. The returns are substantial: 59 percent of early adopters reported a significant ROI on their M2M investment.

Despite the market buzz, many operators and CSPs are yet to zero in on the most profitable and operationally efficient way to support this new wave of industrialized connectivity. Not least because the range of possible M2M use cases is vast. The diversity of devices being connected, their whereabouts, the conditions in which they operate and the amount of data they produce all impact on the CSP’s choice of supporting network equipment. One key commonality, however, is that all deployments require a connectivity infrastructure capable of aggregating, securing and backhauling M2M data in a cost-effective, fast and reliable manner.

As the number of connected devices skyrockets, the ability to offer a range of traffic management services will be a clincher for operators and CSPs looking to gain a foothold in this market and differentiate their offerings. The good news is that many of these can now be delivered via the CPE, without the need for additional devices. Establishing always-on connectivity is of course vital, but the ability to provide a robust business continuity failover to LTE could also prove attractive to customers for whom any amount of network downtime is harmful, no matter how small. Network monitoring and dynamic traffic routing software managed via the CPE can also be used to support traffic throughput at peak load times.

Before the M2M market can reach true maturity, however, fears relating to data protection and security must be assuaged. Given the limited processing power of M2M’s connecting sensors – which are incapable of performing heavy duty computational functions such as encryption – the opportunity here is in the hands of CSPs and, again, the CPE can help.

See full post

Is integrating SBC functionality into the router the way forward for accelerating the availability of SIP trunking services?

is-integrating-sbc-functionality-into-the-router-the-way-forward-for-accelerating-the-availability-of-sip-trunking-services

Although many businesses have deployed IP-based PBX systems to handle their corporate telephony needs, so far relatively few have then taken the next step to a full SIP trunking service particularly in Europe.

To some extent this can be explained by the “if it is not broken – why fix it” approach but is actually more to do with service providers looking to leverage maximum return from their substantial infrastructure investments and disincentivizing customers who may want to transition from their still lucrative ISDN connections.

However, many companies are now re-assessing the merits of integrating their video, data and voice requirements in a unified communications (UC) package opening up new opportunities as well as challenges for service providers. With many of these enterprises sensibly opting for a phased transition to an all-IP UC platform to avoid potential costly business disruption, CSPs are faced with connecting SIP trunks into an array of IP and legacy PBX and mixed PSTN/IP voice environments.

For Telcos and service providers this means facing an array of non-standard SIP trunk implementations, involving a mix of old and new technologies, that can result in increased operational expenditure combined with reduced revenue potential. Given this double-whammy effect it is understandable why they tend to be less than enthusiastic in actively promoting an end-to-end IP telephony platform. For that reason, TDM trunks has remained the preferred demarcation line of choice for service providers, even though TDM is converted to VoIP within their network.

However, there now seems to be an increasing momentum and growing market demand for SIP trunking services from enterprises. A recent Infonetics1 research report forecasts growth in the business adoption of UC and VoIP services to reach $35bn by 2018. Part of the report showed a massive, 50% increase in SIP trunking in the US in 2013, with similar growth in EMEA expected to follow in 2014 and beyond.

See full post

Tomorrow’s CPE: the Wimbledon of network virtualization?

tomorrow-s-cpe-the-wimbledon-of-network-virtualization

Despite the industry’s charge toward network virtualization, the need for customers to connect their routers to non-Ethernet legacy connections is not going away. Couple this with the fact that a bunch of emerging network functions require an on-prem appliance, and the virtualized ‘CPE of the future’ starts to feel, well, really rather physical. So, is the CPE the Wimbledon of the network; ever-present, resistant to change, but perhaps also capable of surprising us all with its innovations?

Take Wimbledon’s white dress code, for example; a deeply entrenched tradition that has become a defining characteristic of the tournament. But in recent years, however, the dress discipline has been partially relaxed. Today, the tournament accommodates at least some expressions of color. Similarly, the majority of CPE appliances that today deliver network connectivity and voice gateway functions are specialized devices, and will stoically remain so for the next few years. It’s just too expensive to do otherwise, until fiber with G.fast as a short-haul copper Ethernet extension become ubiquitous and all voice terminals are IP-based. Out of necessity, therefore, incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) will have little option but to support this CPE model. In other words, it looks like the traditionalists, both at the tennis and on the network, can rest easy. For now, at least.

But pressure to change is mounting. Competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), together with alternative network operators, are more agile and, since they can target Ethernet-only network connections, can move more quickly to a vCPE approach. That said, some network functions will need to remain ‘on premise’, namely link management, service demarcation and service assurance. The network functions that can migrate to the virtualized center will do so over time. In our Wimbledon analogy, this equates to another tournament altogether, played on a far more contemporary surface than Wimbledon’s time-honoured grass. Competition indeed for the ‘historic home of tennis’.

The need for some functions to remain on premise means that the CPE will increasingly comprise hybrid devices – ones that support both traditional network functions and those located in a centralized and virtualized core. Incidentally, this won’t be just a single data center, but rather a set of distributed virtualized centers located with the network infrastructure (most likely at POPs) to mitigate traffic tromboning.

The huge IT challenge of accommodating virtualized delivery of services mean that the CPE will also need to become a multi-tongued device able to speak next-generation protocols – Netconf, Openflow – as well as traditional CLI, TR-069 and SNMP. It seems inevitably that that, after holding out for as long as they can, traditionalists at both Wimbledon and in the CPE, will be forced to accept some variations, but only within ‘proper’ limits of course!

See full post

Two killer forces shaping the future of the CPE

ThefutureoftheCPEblogpartone

Powerful forces are steering the development of the CPE, explains Pravin Mirchandani, CMO at service-enabling network access specialist, OneAccess.

As the telecoms industry continues to hack a path toward network virtualization, the terms used to describe future customer premises equipment (CPE) are under almost continuous review. ‘White box’, ‘virtual CPE’ (vCPE) and ‘physical CPE’ (pCPE) each represent their own specific and shifting vision of how the network functions present in today’s CPE will be virtualized. But beneath the jargon, two powerful forces are steering the technology’s development.

1. The need to support non-Ethernet legacy connections

Ethernet is the assumed and, by and large, the only connectivity option for a low-cost white box approach, yet it is far from ubiquitously available as a WAN connectivity option at the customer premises. What’s more, the cost of increasing Ethernet coverage for connecting customer premises (typically by fiber) is growing as the lower cost, high-density deployment options become exhausted. Consequently, one of the key issues that virtualization faces is the need to support legacy connections between TDM-based PBX, alarm and other serial connections to various types of DSL-based WAN access technologies. This means that the bridging technology - the purpose-designed CPE - will be around for some time, especially for network connectivity devices and voice gateways.

2. To work, some functions need to be on the network’s edge

As the guy responsible for products at an access platform CPE vendor, what strikes me about our current work plan and roadmap is the huge amount of additional functionality that our CSP and MSP customers are asking us to deliver in our current-generation CPE. These include link management schemes for failover, bonding and offload; as well as shaping and event-based schemes, to ensure that business-critical Cloud-based applications flow regardless of the state of the network. Additional measurement capability is also being demanded, to remotely diagnose issues and ensure that SLAs are met. Security-hardening is also a request. The list goes on. By their nature, these types of intelligent functions have to reside in the CPE; you can’t failover, offload or measure local service levels remotely from the Cloud.

Given that you can’t economically ‘white-box’ legacy connectivity requirements, nor can you centralize network functions that rightly belong on the customer premises, only part of the CPE is ripe for virtualization. With this in mind, don’t expect today’s CPE appliances to disappear from the network’s edge any time soon.

See full post

NFV: The Current State of Play

SDN_NFV_virtualization_virtualizasation_lights_lumires_blue_bleu_tunnel

Act One of the NFV show has finished, leaving operators to sift through the hype, piece together what they have learned and knuckle down to the serious business of design, feasibility and business case development. Pravin Mirchandani, CMO and NFV Evangelist at OneAccess, recounts some sentiments and soundbites from the NFV circuit.

1. Whoa! NFV is expensive!

Operators have now moved beyond best guess, back-of-the-envelope cost estimates. At least some measured CAPEX projections are in, and with them comes a grudging realization of quite how costly NFV is going to be. Why? Because operators must build x86 server farms right across their network in order to host their NFV infrastructure (NFVi); something which is going to mean a significant investment up front. What’s more, because virtualized traffic management requires the NFVi to be distributed (to provide appropriate location of network functions and traffic management right across the geographic reaches of the network), savings can’t be made by consolidating these farms on a single location. Sitting on top of the compute infrastructure, there is of course the software infrastructure and network functions, which also needs to be funded. What this has resulted in is a marked shift in focus to citing OPEX savings, service velocity and service agility as the main justifications for NFV, away from CAPEX reductions

2. We need SLAs, not just I/O

To date, when considering performance, the industry’s focus has been on input/output (I/O) but, given that virtualized network functions (VNFs) are sold as services to paying customers, I/O is only half of the story. To be commercial contenders, VNFs need to be associated with performance guarantees that are enshrined in service level agreements (SLAs). Further, an assessment of compute and memory footprint for each network function is required in order to assess deployment scalability. This is no great challenge where dedicated hardware is concerned, but when the network function is software-based (as with a VNF), located on a shared computing platform, the factors influencing performance are dependent on a range of resource-related variables, making guarantees harder to establish. This area needs serious attention before the NFV can move into a fully commercial phase with the major operators.

3. Pricing is all over the map

Many operators won’t open the door to a VNF vendor without full disclosure of their pricing model, especially as a couple of leading vendors have announced pricing levels that are considered by the operators as unreasonable. Pricing models also remain fragmented between vendors, making it difficult for operators to compare like for like. The software element, in particular, is a minefield. Unsurprisingly, some vendors are applying NFV pricing in accordance with the anticipated impact that NFV will have on their future hardware revenues. This is distorting the market at a very early stage, inhibiting assessment by the operator community.

4. VNF trials are defined by what’s available, not by what’s needed

A lamentable result of the current NFV market is that operators’ choices of VNF trials are being defined by availability, not strategic objectives. vCPE and virtual firewall functions have both been around for a while, but are these two functions the only ones that the operators want to do? Perhaps it’s too early to say. In any case, the real focus of today’s VNF trials is to successfully build the NFVi and nail down the orchestration and management pieces. In this sense, it doesn’t yet matter what the actual VNF is. Over time, this will change. Operators will begin to assess which VNFs are the most important for their business, and which will save them the most money? Ideally, operators should be bringing this thinking forward; if they settle on VNFs that differ from those they have trialled, it will be a struggle to understand the commercial, technical and operational implications.

See full post

IoT encryption: A revenue driver for CSPs

IoT

Back in July 2014, an Intel study(1) indicated that 41% of IT managers and directors identified data protection as a key obstacle to overcome before the Internet of Things (IoT) could be fully embraced. 44% cited data encryption as the answer to this problem.

Since then, despite IoT dialogue intensifying, relatively little attention has been given to how IoT data from fleets of connected devices will be secured. Perhaps ‘devices’ is the wrong word. For manufacturing plants, together with hotels, gas stations, retailers and a host of other enterprise beneficiaries, IoT is less about investing in new technologies and more about retrofitting sensors to existing machines and other physical assets.

This matters because IoT sensors have limited processing power and, as a result, are incapable of performing heavy duty computational functions, like encryption. So where does this leave us? We know that encryption is a deal breaker for IT decision makers but, at the same time, it seems beyond reach.

Happily, the solution is also a revenue opportunity for communication service providers (CSPs), and involves encryption being performed at a central point before the data is transmitted across the WAN. After all, the biggest risk to corporate data security does not come from the factory floor, the hotel staff, or the gas station attendant; it comes from the threat of that data being intercepted by a third party as it is being transmitted across the web.

By using a customer premises-based router as a managed service delivery platform, CSPs can centralise all of a customer’s IoT data from across their sites and provide encryption as a service, pre-transmission. What’s more, because the CPE’s functions are managed by the CSP, it is about as tamper-resistant a piece of hardware as the enterprise is likely to find.

See full post

SDN/NFV – Is it the breakthrough CSPs need to help level the OTT playing field?

acceleration-techniques-for-white-box-cpe

I think that it is fair to say that the business communications services market is going through one of its most challenging periods at the moment as CSPs struggle to come to terms with the demand for faster, more reliable and feature-rich services from their customers, whilst also dealing with increased competition and the inevitable pressure this puts on prices. Although this is a typical and predictable scenario in what is a rapidly maturing tech-based market, it means that service providers cannot afford to assume that their customers will continue to renew their contracts out of a sense of loyalty, no matter what.

With increased choices for core communications requirements such as telephony and business application services readily available from specialist 3rd party providers in the Cloud, the CSPs’ pipe is now in danger of becoming regarded as just another basic utility along with the mains power and water services any organization needs to function. The challenge for CSPs is to find ways to tap into the new revenue potential, and compensate for ARPU decreases, by offering innovative new services themselves and fighting back against the OTT players who are increasingly eating more of their lunch. But it is not easy to see how this can be achieved without a radical change to their existing core infrastructure and CPE access technologies.

Given this challenging picture, the arrival of SDN/NFV technology on the scene could be the timely and welcome development CSPs have been looking for. With the potential to level the playing field and enabling the rapid rollout of new services virtually on demand, service providers could realistically begin to compete on price, features and functionality with pure-play hosted service operators.

SDN, and NFV functionality in particular provides the prospect of enabling service providers to add new features or switch existing services on and off in alignment with customers’ changing needs without having to install new network edge devices or change the CPE. When combined with the ability to remotely manage and provision unlimited numbers of individual routers from a central office location it means the proposition could literally be a game-changer for service providers.

SDN/NFV however, represents both opportunity and challenge for CSPs. Its promise of agility, flexibility and reduced costs are highly attractive but implementing SDN/NFV across their current silo-based organization and changing well-established business practices will be a non-trivial and lengthy set of people-oriented tasks to navigate. CSPs are also looking to vendors to progress beyond architectural and vision statements and show them some real use-cases for this new technology.

See full post

Agile businesses of all sizes need communications partners that can offer flexible, future-proof solutions

do-cli-experts-need-to-worry-about-their-jobs

There is no doubt that the operational and financial appeal of “The Cloud” is gaining more traction each year and across a wider spectrum of businesses, with Gartner[1] predicting that more than half of IT spend will be Cloud related in 2016 and over half of large enterprises having a public/private hybrid Cloud platform by 2017.

What is also evident is that the more the “X-as-a-service” range grows the more the Cloud becomes a compelling and realistic option for mid-size and smaller agile businesses, who see the flexibility it offers not only as a way of controlling costs but also critical in terms of staying competitive by enabling greater alignment between IT consumption and market fluctuations. This pragmatic approach particularly applies to multi-branch organizations where application and data sharing is crucial to the productivity of the business, which otherwise could mean significant IT investment in potentially redundant LAN-based resources and expensive localized support systems.

To derive the full benefit from the Cloud, agile businesses need to engage with equally agile communications service providers (CSPs), which are able to deliver fast and reliable access capable of supporting a broad range of granular, all-IP based services in an exclusively WAN-dependent environment. Using the same argument it follows that agile CSPs need equally agile technology vendor partners, who can help them to respond to the evolving demands of their customers with flexible and scalable products at competitive price-points.

Traditionally, CSPs have had limited choices when it comes to selecting the CPE router devices that provide the access gateway to the Cloud, particularly for the highly competitive and price-sensitive small to mid-range branch office sector. Although the leading router vendors such as Cisco are geared towards the major enterprise market, in the perceived absence of a real alternative these well-known suppliers have typically gone on to become incumbent partners for many CSPs.

However, we are now seeing this trend beginning to break down as CSPs look to gain competitive advantage in a buyers’ market and last year our new generation of multi-service routers, purpose-designed for CSPs, over two quarters out-shipped Cisco in Europe for the smaller, branch office customer sector. These routers not only enable CSPs to offer high performance SLAs but provide a platform for a range of value-added services that can both enhance the user experience and ensure efficient bandwidth provisioning for both data and voice-based, fixed-line and mobile, communications.

See full post

Latest News

  • EKINOPS Celebrates MEF Technology Solutions Award Win

    EKINOPS (Euronext Paris - FR0011466069 – EKI),a leading provider of open, future-proof and flexible network solutions to service providers, has been recognised with a Technology Solutions Award at the 2019 MEF Awards, which took place during the leading industry conference, MEF19 in Los Angeles.

     
  • EKINOPS and IEC Telecom Group deliver next-generation maritime satellite communication solution

    EKINOPS (Euronext Paris - FR0011466069 – EKI), a leading supplier of optical transport equipment and router solutions for network operators, has launched with IEC Telecom Group, one of the leading global providers of managed network communication solutions, OneGate, an agile solution that protects the critical communications functions of maritime vessels.

     
  • EKINOPS to showcase joint SD-WAN Proof of Concept at MEF 2019 together with TELUS and Inmanta

    EKINOPS (Euronext Paris - FR0011466069 – EKI),a leading provider of open, future-proof and  fully flexible network solutions to service providers, has been selected by MEF to participate in the sixth annual MEF 3.0 PoC Showcase at leading industry conference, MEF19, which is taking place from 18 to 22 November 2019 in Los Angeles.

     

EKINOPS Worldwide

EKINOPS EMEA & APAC
Telephone +33 (0)1 77 71 12 00

EKINOPS AMERICAS
Telephone +1 (571) 385-4103

 

E-MAIL ALERTS

Receive automatically EKINOPS information in your inbox!